FIRST TWO MEETINGS HELD, YET NO WORD ON DIGITAL IDENTITY OF NITI AAYOG

Extending from:
GO DIGITAL, BUT NO DIGITAL IDENTITY FOR NITI AAYOG YET, AND IT GETS GOING TOMORROW
https://santoshchaubey.wordpress.com/2015/02/05/go-digital-but-no-digital-identity-for-niti-aayog-yet-and-it-gets-going-tomorrow/

On Friday, the first formal meeting of NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India Aayog) was chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi where he deliberated with economists and policy experts to get their inputs for the Sunday meeting.

On Sunday, in the first governing council meeting of the Aayog, chief ministers of many states gathered at the 7RCR, the prime minister’s residence, to discuss on the basics on which the newly established think tank of the government of India that formally replaced Planning Commission on January 1 would work.

The suggestions from the Friday meeting were incorporated in today’s proceedings reflecting in the proposal on forming a task force in every state to push agriculture sector. As expected by the history of Mamata Banarjee Vs Narendra Modi rivalry, no one from West Bengal turned up in the governing council meet. But those present agreed to work further on the lines of action decided today.

Chief ministers will voluntarily opt to join one of the three sub-groups on ‘streamlining central schemes’, ‘development of skilled manpower’ and ‘clean India campaign’. One more task force on poverty alleviation in every state is also in the pipeline.

A logical, fair enough beginning for the think tank that has been established to replace the 65 year old central policy-making body of the government of India – Planning Commission.

But where is the website of NITI Aayog?

There were no words before the first meeting of NITI Aayog on Friday. There are no words on it even after the second meeting held today.

Where is the digital identity of NITI Aayog in ‘Digital India’?

We had expected it to come on Friday, then on Sunday, but it didn’t come.

Let’s see when it comes – all we can say at the moment.

©/IPR: Santosh Chaubey–https://santoshchaubey.wordpress.com/

AAP EXPECTED TO SWEEP DELHI POLLS: WHAT WENT WRONG FOR BJP? (III)

THE QUESTIONS

After the Exit Poll results on February 7, the day of voting..

1. Was BJP always in two minds on its chances in Delhi and that ultimately resulted in the mess that we saw in these assembly polls, as it could really never assess its ground properly and that made it try to delay the Delhi polls until polls became inevitable? Assembly polls could have been held soon after the Lok Sabha polls. Instead, BJP chose to keep on delaying the polls. Let’s safely assume that had the BJP’s central leadership decided on facing the polls earlier, the Lieutenant-Governor nod, with L-G being a central government appointee and representative, would never be an issue.

2. The natural question that emerges from this is – what made BJP feel so, not sure of its chances – especially after a brilliant history making performance in the Lok Sabha polls?

3. The natural corollary, in turn to the previous question is – did the BJP believe, in spite of making a war-cry about it in public, that the ‘deserter act’ was not enough to put Kejriwal in the dock of an incriminating public trial? Going by the projections of the Exit Polls, it seems BJP was right, if its leaders indeed thought so.

4. That takes us spontaneously to the next question – if it was so, if BJP was not confident about the ‘the deserter tag card’, why didn’t it build an alternate strategy to corner Kejriwal? Throughout the campaign run, the main point to target Kejriwal was ‘his deserter act’ mixed with ‘alleged acts of anarchy by Kejriwal and his camp like protests against an elected government’ .

5. So, where did BJP err – in calculating the anti-Kejriwal or anti-AAP public sentiment – or in assessing the ground beneath its feat in Delhi’s politics – or in both?

6. Or was it an act of sheer negligence, fuelled by over-confidence? Winning the Lok Sabha polls with clear majority, first party to do so after 1984, and winning three assembly polls in quick succession, Maharashtra, Haryana, Jharkhand and emerging as the second largest party in Jammu & Kashmir – did the confidence thereafter make Delhi a light affair for BJP strategists who believed things could be managed but when they realized the seriousness of affairs, of their faulty handling of Delhi elections, it had become too late to reverse the tide?

7. Who are all responsible for this negligence? Would BJP do an honest introspection to plug the holes given the fact that an AAP sweep would be an underperformance by BJP and would hurt party’s chances in cracking the citadels of electoral politics in India – Bihar this year, West Bengal the next year and Uttar Pradesh in 2017. Losing these three states would make a 2019 re-run much more difficult for Narendra Modi and BJP.

©/IPR: Santosh Chaubey–https://santoshchaubey.wordpress.com/